Supertotobet0141 giriş sonrası mobil bahis oynayabilir ve kazanç sağlayacak işlemlerde bulunabilirsiniz. Supertotobet0141 canlı bahis oynama seçenekleri geniş olan mobil bahis oynama sitesi ile çok kazanacaksınız. Supertotobet0141 yeni adresinden siteye her yerden anında kesintisiz ulaşabilir ve sorun yaşamadan bahis işlemi gerçekleştirebilirsiniz.
In the 52nd minute of the match, in the free kick used by Ghezzal from the right wing, the ball went out in Welinton’s head kick. Welinton reacted to the referee by stating that he was withdrawn from the position. Referee Halis Özkayha continued the position after talking to the VAR referee. Who said what about the disputed position? Former referee Erman Toroğlu, about the position, “They said, ‘He kept the jersey, it is no longer penalty. I say, “Is your mother beautiful?” They are confusing. Welinton’s position is very clear penalty. This one has no gray one. Position like bonito. Net penalty. ” Former Referee Selçuk Dereli: “Welinton’s position is open penalty.” Former Referee Deniz Ateş Bitnel: “Net penalty. Why is there VAR?” Former football player Ali Gültiken: “Continuation decision is correct.” Former football player Ayhan Akman: “Continuation decision. “Former football player Tümer Metin:” Penalty. “Deniz Çoban:” If VAR referee Bahattin Şimşek does not interfere with the 100% penalty position against Welinton, what will he get involved in, which one? ” Noting that Welinton’s controversial position in the Konyaspor penalty area is a penalty, Beşiktaş Vice-President Emre Kocadağ said, “There is a position where Welinton is withdrawn. The rule has changed, if he pulls and leaves, it is said that there is no penalty. As far as I have watched, that pull kick also affects. I think that position is a penalty. The federation and the Central Referee Board will make its evaluation. DISCUSSED POSITION AT WORK: