K.T, who rented his house in Yamaçtepe District of the central Onikişubat district of Kahramanmaraş, sent a notice to evacuate the house through the Kahramanmaraş 7th Notary because his tenant A.G did not pay his debt.
Allegedly, K.T, who wanted to evacuate the house where his tenant lived before the warrant expires, his father M.T. and his relative İ.T. with the help of the locksmith, opened the door and took out the items.
Upon the tenant A.G’s complaint to the Kahramanmaraş Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, a lawsuit was filed against the landlord, two relatives and locksmith at the Kahramanmaraş 9th Criminal Court of First Instance for “violating the immunity of the house”.
Immediately after the hearings, the prosecutor announced his opinion that the tenant A.G was warned to pay the rent and dues, and the defendants K.T, M.T. and İ.T went to the front of the house and stated that they showed the locksmith Batuhan Demir the warning letter from the notary public. According to the statements of the defendants and witnesses, the prosecutor stated that only M.T entered the house opened with the help of a locksmith, removed the furniture from the house and the other defendants were waiting outside, and that it was confirmed that M.T had committed the crime of violating his home immunity, but this was also subject to the provisions of conciliation. requested that the file be sent to the Kahramanmaraş Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office of Conciliation Office and the other defendants be acquitted.
10 MONTHS PENALTY PENALTY
If the judge who announced his decision, the defendants K.T, M.T. and İ.T, on the grounds that they committed the crime of “violating the immunity of housing” with more than one person, and decided to postpone the announcement of the verdict.
The judge acquitted locksmith Batuhan Demir due to the lack of evidence that he entered the residence.